IAS Prelims 2025 — Polity & Governance | Question 6 (Current Affairs)
Authentic Classroom Explanation by IAS Monk
📍 The Question
Consider the following statements:
Statement I:
In India, State Governments have no power for making rules for grant of concessions in respect of extraction of minor minerals even though such minerals are located in their territories.
Statement II:
In India, the Central Government has the power to notify minor minerals under the relevant law.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
(a) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II explains Statement I
(b) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II does not explain Statement I
(c) Statement I is correct but Statement II is not correct
(d) Statement I is not correct but Statement II is correct
✅ Correct Answer: (d) Statement I is not correct but Statement II is correct
🎯 Theme of the Question
Polity & Governance
Centre–State Powers
Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957
Federalism | Minor Minerals | Rule-making Authority
This question tests statutory federal balance, not the Seventh Schedule directly. UPSC wants clarity on who defines and who regulates minor minerals.
🧠 Classroom Explanation
Let us examine both statements strictly with reference to the MMDR Act, 1957.
🔹 Statement I ❌
Claim: State Governments have no power to make rules for grant of concessions for minor minerals.
📌 Legal Position:
- Section 15(1) of the MMDR Act, 1957 explicitly empowers State Governments to make rules for:
- Grant of quarry leases
- Mining leases
- Other mineral concessions
in respect of minor minerals within their territories.
✔️ This is a clear statutory delegation to States.
📌 Verdict:
❌ Statement I is incorrect
🔹 Statement II ✅
Claim: Central Government has the power to notify minor minerals.
📌 Legal Position:
- Section 3(e) of the MMDR Act, 1957 defines “minor minerals”.
- It authorises the Central Government to declare any mineral as a minor mineral by official notification.
✔️ Thus:
- Centre decides classification (what is a minor mineral)
- States regulate concessions (how it is extracted)
📌 Verdict:
✅ Statement II is correct
🔑 Core Constitutional–Statutory Logic (UPSC Favourite)
| Aspect | Authority |
|---|---|
| Defining / notifying minor minerals | Central Government |
| Making rules for concessions of minor minerals | State Governments |
This division preserves uniform classification with decentralised regulation.
📊 Final Assessment
| Statement | Status |
|---|---|
| Statement I | ❌ Incorrect |
| Statement II | ✅ Correct |
👉 Correct answer: (d)
🧩 Prelims Trap Alert
- ❌ “Minerals are in State territory, so Centre has no role” → Wrong
- ❌ “Centre controls everything related to minerals” → Wrong
- ✔️ Centre defines, States regulate (minor minerals) → Correct framework
🧠 One-Line Memory Hook
“Centre names the minor mineral, State grants the mining.”
🧭 IAS Monk Whisper
Federalism in India often hides in Acts, not in headlines. UPSC rewards those who read the fine print.
