A New Accord for a Safer Tomorrow: WHO’s Pandemic Agreement

INTERNATIONAL HERO
🗓️ Post Date: May 23, 2025
📚 Thematic Focus: GS2 – Health, International Agreements, Global Governance

🌍 Intro Whisper

In a rare show of global unity, nations have come together not to win a war — but to prevent one. A silent war, against unseen viral enemies. The WHO’s new Pandemic Agreement promises just that — equity, preparedness, and a vow never to repeat the mistakes of COVID-19.

🔑 Key Highlights

• Historic Milestone: WHO member states approved the Pandemic Agreement, a legally binding instrument under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution.
• Purpose: Born out of the COVID-19 experience, the Agreement aims to correct past inequities and strengthen pandemic preparedness, including access to vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics.
• Signature & Enforcement: Will open for signature after final annex completion and enter into force once 60 countries ratify.
• Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS):
  • Member states to develop a system for pathogen sharing and equitable benefit distribution.
  • Pharmaceutical firms to allocate 20% of their real-time pandemic product output (vaccines, diagnostics, therapeutics) to WHO for equitable global distribution.
• Complementary Reforms:
  • Supplements the International Health Regulations (IHR) Amendments of 2024.
  • Establishes a Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network (GSCL).
  • Introduces a Coordinating Financial Mechanism to support global pandemic efforts.
• Legal Significance: Only the second treaty under Article 19, after the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2003).

🧭 Concept Explainer: Article 19 and WHO’s Legal Authority

Article 19 of the WHO Constitution empowers the World Health Assembly to adopt binding conventions or agreements on matters within the organization’s competence. Such instruments must be ratified by individual member states to become enforceable.

The 2003 Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) was the first such legal instrument. This Pandemic Agreement becomes the second — reflecting an elevated level of international consensus and urgency.

📌 GS Paper Mapping

• GS Paper 2:
  • Health Sector Reforms
  • Role of International Organizations (WHO)
  • Bilateral & Multilateral Agreements
  • Global Health Equity

🌱 A Thought Spark — by IAS Monk

In an age where borders close and hearts open during crises, perhaps this treaty is not just about pandemics — but about reimagining a world where solidarity, not sovereignty, is our first reflex.

High Quality Mains Essay For Practice :

Word Limit 1000-1200

A Pact Beyond Borders: The WHO Pandemic Agreement and the Future of Global Health Governance

Introduction

In a world that staggered through the ravages of the COVID-19 pandemic, the global health community now stands at a rare turning point. On May 23, 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) adopted a landmark Pandemic Agreement — a legal and moral commitment by its member states to prevent, prepare for, and respond equitably to future pandemics. This global accord is not merely a reaction to a health emergency; it is a vision for a more just, cooperative, and resilient world.

This essay explores the rationale behind the agreement, its key provisions, implications for global governance, and the path ahead for India and the international community.

Why the World Needed a Pandemic Treaty

The COVID-19 pandemic was a litmus test of global solidarity. While scientific progress delivered vaccines at record speed, access was anything but equitable. High-income countries secured the lion’s share of supplies, while low- and middle-income countries struggled for basics. The pandemic revealed a deep fault line: a health emergency anywhere can become a health emergency everywhere, but resources were not shared accordingly.

The WHO recognized the structural imbalance between pandemic threats and the tools to fight them. This agreement is therefore not just a public health measure but a blueprint for equitable international cooperation, data sharing, and mutual accountability.

Legal Foundations and Historical Context

The Pandemic Agreement has been adopted under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution, which permits the World Health Assembly to adopt conventions or agreements that become binding on member states upon ratification.

There is historical precedence: the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) adopted in 2003 was the first international health treaty under this article. The Pandemic Agreement is only the second, signifying its gravity and global relevance.

This treaty complements the International Health Regulations (IHR) amendments of 2024, which govern surveillance, early warning systems, and global coordination during health emergencies.

Key Provisions of the Pandemic Agreement

1. Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) System

This is the heart of the agreement. It proposes that countries and private entities must share genomic and biological information of emerging pathogens rapidly. In return, pharmaceutical companies are required to contribute 20% of real-time production of vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics to WHO — with a focus on equitable global distribution, especially to developing countries.

This system aims to break the cycle of biological data hoarding and vaccine nationalism witnessed during COVID-19.

2. Coordinating Financial Mechanism

To ensure preparedness is not limited to rich nations, the agreement introduces a funding model where countries contribute based on capacity. This fund will support low-income countries in strengthening their public health infrastructure, training workforce, and investing in surveillance tools.

3. Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network (GSCL)

A centralized system will be created to coordinate the supply, distribution, and stockpiling of essential pandemic tools — masks, PPEs, diagnostic kits, and vaccines. It will facilitate rapid response and emergency deployment during future outbreaks, avoiding the fragmented and competitive procurement witnessed during COVID-19.

4. Inclusive Governance

The agreement mandates collaboration between governments, WHO, civil society, academia, private sector, and indigenous communities to build inclusive and locally sensitive response strategies. Transparency and real-time communication are emphasized.

5. Equity and Gender-Sensitive Approaches

The treaty calls for health policies that acknowledge gender disparities in access and caregiving burdens. It recognizes that women and marginalized communities often bear the brunt of disrupted health services during crises.

Significance of the Agreement

🔹 Legal Uniformity in Public Health Response

The agreement lays down a legally enforceable framework to ensure consistency in global response. Countries are obligated to follow norms that reduce duplication, inefficiency, and unilateral actions.

🔹 Restoration of Trust in Global Institutions

WHO faced criticism for delayed response during the early days of COVID-19. This agreement seeks to rebuild confidence in WHO’s central coordinating role and reinforce its ability to issue binding obligations, not just advisories.

🔹 Prevention of Future Pandemics

By investing in early warning systems, genomic surveillance, and PABS, the agreement seeks to catch emerging outbreaks at their source, especially zoonotic spillovers from animal to human.

🔹 Empowerment of Low- and Middle-Income Countries

For the first time, the treaty mandates pharmaceutical corporations to provide a portion of pandemic response tools to WHO, bypassing commercial monopolies and strengthening health equity.

India’s Role and Response

India was an active participant in the negotiations and has historically championed vaccine equity through its leadership in the Global South and participation in the COVAX initiative. It has also played a vital role in pharma production and digital public health infrastructure (like CoWIN).

However, India has raised legitimate concerns over intellectual property rights (IPR) and data sovereignty. The treaty’s success for India will depend on how it balances access to health technologies with the protection of indigenous research and manufacturing interests.

India’s support for the agreement also aligns with its Neighbourhood First and Vaccine Maitri diplomatic doctrines, reinforcing its status as a responsible global player in health.

Challenges Ahead

🔸 Ratification and Political Will

For the agreement to enter into force, 60 countries must ratify it domestically — a process that may face political resistance, especially from nationalist governments or pharmaceutical lobbies.

🔸 Compliance Monitoring

Without a global enforcement mechanism, compliance may remain voluntary in practice. The treaty needs to develop penalties or incentives for adherence.

🔸 Pharmaceutical Resistance

The private sector, particularly Big Pharma, may resist the 20% contribution requirement, arguing it undermines IPR protections and profit models. The balance between health equity and commercial viability is a tightrope.

🔸 Digital Infrastructure Gap

Many low-income countries lack the real-time digital tools for surveillance and coordination. Unless supported by technology transfer, the equity aim may remain aspirational.

A Global Turning Point

The Pandemic Agreement is more than a legal document — it is a moral charter for the 21st century. It envisions a world that can rise above fragmented nationalism to build a shared global immunity against invisible threats.

Pandemics do not carry passports. This treaty signals that, finally, global governance might begin to act that way too.

Conclusion

The WHO Pandemic Agreement is a bold experiment in preemptive international cooperation. It carries within it the lessons of COVID-19 — the urgency of early warning, the pain of inequity, the chaos of fragmented responses, and the power of collective resilience.

It remains to be seen how swiftly and faithfully this treaty is implemented, but its adoption marks a milestone in humanity’s journey to protect itself — not just from disease, but from division.

As nations gather under the WHO umbrella in the post-pandemic age, the message is clear: in the next crisis, the world must act not just fast — but fair.

Target IAS-26: Daily MCQs :

📌 Prelims Practice MCQs