
đź§June 17, 2025 Post 3:🧬Air India Boeing Crash and DNA Identification | High Quality Mains Essay: The Science of Memory: How DNA Identification Brings Dignity to Death | For IAS-2026 :Prelims MCQs
Air India Boeing Crash and DNA Identification

NATIONAL
Post Date: June 17, 2025
📚 Syllabus: GS3 – Science and Technology
🧬 Thematic Focus: DNA Forensics | Disaster Response | Science & Technology
🌫️ Intro Whisper
In moments of unspeakable tragedy, when identities are reduced to remnants and names become fragile memories, science becomes the final bridge between loss and closure. After the recent Air India Dreamliner crash, that bridge is built through DNA.
🔍 Key Highlights
- Context: A fatal crash of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner in Ahmedabad led authorities to deploy DNA analysis for identifying remains.
- Why DNA?
DNA is unique for every individual (except identical twins). In disasters involving intense heat, mutilation, or decomposition, DNA becomes the most reliable tool for identification. - Challenges in DNA Identification:
– DNA degradation begins immediately after death.
– Factors: tissue type, environmental exposure (heat, humidity), and delay in sample collection.
– Hard tissues like bones and teeth retain DNA longer than soft tissues. - Preservation Protocols:
– Samples must be stored cold, preferably frozen.
– Soft tissues preserved in 95% ethanol if freezing isn’t possible. - Methods of Analysis:
- STR (Short Tandem Repeat) Analysis: Uses repeating sequences in nuclear DNA; requires high-quality DNA.
- mtDNA (Mitochondrial DNA) Analysis: Best for degraded samples; inherited maternally.
- Y-STR Analysis: Matches paternal lineage using Y-chromosome DNA.
- SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism): Used when DNA is highly degraded; less informative than STR.
- Sources for Reference DNA:
– Family members (especially parents, children).
– Personal belongings like combs, razors, toothbrushes.
đź§Ş Concept Explainer: How DNA Helps in Disaster Victim Identification
Disaster victim identification (DVI) relies on comparing DNA from remains with known reference profiles. In large-scale tragedies like air crashes, traditional methods like visual recognition or fingerprints may fail. DNA can withstand heat or degradation to some extent, offering a reliable match when other methods fall short. The strength of DNA identification lies in its precision — even a few preserved cells can yield a definitive match.
đź§ GS Paper Mapping
- GS3 → Science & Technology: Role of biotechnology in forensic science.
- GS2 → Governance: Disaster management and victim compensation mechanisms.
- GS1 → Society: Emotional and legal significance of identity in death.
💠A Thought Spark — by IAS Monk
“When science becomes memory’s servant, even death yields to dignity.”
In the heart of catastrophe, DNA forensics does more than identify the dead — it restores the humanity lost in a blaze of metal and sorrow.
High Quality Mains Essay For Practice :
Word Limit 1000-1200
The Science of Memory: How DNA Identification Brings Dignity to Death
On a seemingly ordinary day, the skies above Ahmedabad bore witness to extraordinary tragedy. An Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner, once a symbol of modern aviation, met a devastating end — flames, fragments, and finality. Amidst the wreckage, what remained were not just charred belongings or twisted steel, but the heart-wrenching ambiguity of unrecognizable remains. And in such moments, when visual identification fails and names are reduced to numbers, science steps in—not with spectacle, but with solemnity. It is DNA, the microscopic custodian of our identity, that becomes the last voice of the voiceless.
The Science of Uniqueness
Deoxyribonucleic acid — DNA — is the biological script that writes the story of every human being. Except for identical twins, every individual carries a unique genetic fingerprint encoded in their DNA, making it an unparalleled tool for identification. In the wake of catastrophes—air crashes, fires, bombings, or natural calamities—where conventional identifiers like faces, fingerprints, or medical records are rendered useless, DNA becomes the gold standard of forensic science.
Its reliability lies not only in its uniqueness but also in its resilience. Even under extreme conditions, traces of DNA can survive in bones, teeth, and deep tissues. But this reliability is contingent on speed and science—collection must be timely, preservation must be meticulous, and analysis must be accurate.
From Tragedy to Truth: The DNA Process
The process begins with collection. For unidentified remains, biological samples such as skin, muscles, bones, or teeth are harvested. In ideal scenarios, samples are immediately frozen at -20 degrees Celsius to minimize degradation. In the absence of freezing, soft tissues may be preserved in ethanol. But in tropical climates like India, where heat and humidity accelerate decay, every passing hour diminishes the quality of available genetic material.
Once collected, the challenge shifts to reference matching. DNA by itself is not enough; it needs comparison. Ideal matches come from close biological relatives—parents, children, or siblings. Sometimes, personal items such as razors, hairbrushes, or toothbrushes offer usable DNA traces. With this reference, forensic scientists compare genetic markers using different methods depending on the condition of the sample.
Short Tandem Repeat (STR) Analysis is the primary method. It focuses on repeating DNA sequences in nuclear material. These repeats vary greatly among individuals, offering a high degree of specificity. However, STR analysis requires intact nuclear DNA—often unavailable in severely degraded remains.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) Analysis offers an alternative. Unlike nuclear DNA, mtDNA exists outside the cell’s nucleus and is inherited maternally. While not unique to individuals, mtDNA can confirm lineage and is easier to retrieve from degraded samples, making it crucial in old or heat-damaged tissues.
Y-STR Analysis, meanwhile, is specific to male victims and traces paternal lines. It is invaluable when maternal relatives are unavailable, but its utility is limited to males.
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Analysis is a newer method. It examines variations at single points in the genetic code. While less powerful than STR in differentiating individuals, SNPs work well with fragmented or damaged DNA.
Together, these tools form a powerful forensic arsenal—turning ashes and ambiguity into affirmation.
India’s Forensic Preparedness: Promise and Gaps
India has made significant strides in forensic DNA capabilities. National agencies like the Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL) and premier institutes like CDFD in Hyderabad provide advanced analysis. DNA profiling is recognized under Indian law, and courts accept DNA reports as admissible evidence.
However, challenges remain. First, there is a capacity constraint. India’s forensic labs are often overwhelmed. Processing delays, lack of standardised procedures, and variable infrastructure across states reduce turnaround efficiency. In mass casualty events, this bottleneck slows identification and delays closure for grieving families.
Second, legislative ambiguity persists. The DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, introduced in 2019 to create a national DNA data bank and ensure privacy protections, is still pending in Parliament. In its absence, concerns around misuse, consent, and data retention remain.
Third, public awareness is limited. Many families do not understand the importance of reference DNA. In cases of accidents involving migrant workers or tourists, locating close relatives for matching becomes a logistical nightmare.
Beyond Science: The Human Dimension
DNA identification is not just a technological marvel—it is an ethical obligation. For families of victims, uncertainty is the most agonizing form of grief. A confirmed identity provides not just emotional closure, but also legal recognition. It enables funerals, inheritance, insurance claims, and the performance of religious rites. Without identity, death remains incomplete—both in law and in love.
There is also a deeper societal resonance. In a land like India, where the dead are venerated and memorialized, denying a name to the deceased is a form of erasure. DNA restores dignity. It ensures that even in the anonymity of tragedy, identity finds a voice.
Global Standards and Lessons
Across the world, forensic DNA has played a pivotal role in disaster response. After the 9/11 attacks in New York, over 20,000 DNA samples were analyzed. In the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, international collaboration enabled DNA-based reunification of families.
India can learn from these models by establishing a central Disaster DNA Response Cell—a specialized unit equipped with rapid collection kits, mobile labs, and a central database. Preemptive collection of voluntary DNA samples (with consent) from soldiers, frequent flyers, and disaster-prone regions could also fast-track identification in future emergencies.
Moreover, India must invest in public education campaigns. Just as people now understand the basics of vaccination or organ donation, there should be grassroots awareness about DNA’s role in post-mortem identification.
The Path Forward: Science in Service of Humanity
To truly harness DNA identification, India must go beyond labs and legislation. It must build a holistic ecosystem—technological, ethical, and emotional.
- Technologically, it means expanding lab networks, upgrading equipment, and adopting global best practices.
- Legally, it involves enacting robust data protection laws that balance utility with privacy.
- Culturally, it calls for treating DNA not just as a forensic tool, but as a moral responsibility—a final act of respect toward the departed.
Disasters will come. Tragedies will strike. But in those dark moments, DNA can offer light. It whispers, in the language of science, a truth that poetry has long known: even in death, we remain ourselves. Even in ashes, there are signatures of life.
Conclusion
The Air India crash has brought national attention to the quiet heroism of forensic science. As the nation mourns, labs across the country work silently, strand by strand, to restore names to the nameless. It is a reminder that behind every headline is a heartbeat, and behind every DNA profile is a person loved, remembered, and now, finally returned.
Let the science speak. Let memory breathe. Let every lost life be named again.
Quote to End:
“In science we find precision; in identity we find meaning. Together, they give us justice.”
Target IAS-26: Daily MCQs :
📌 Prelims Practice MCQs
Topic: Air India Crash
MCQ 1 – Type 1: How many of the above statements are correct?
Consider the following statements regarding DNA Identification:
1. STR analysis uses short tandem repeats in nuclear DNA and is highly individual-specific.
2. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is inherited from both parents and used when nuclear DNA is degraded.
3. Y-STR analysis is used to trace maternal ancestry.
4. SNP analysis can be useful when DNA samples are highly degraded.
How many of the above statements are correct?
A) Only two
B) Only three
C) All four
D) Only one
🌀 Didn’t get it? Click here (▸) for the Correct Answer & Explanation
âś… Correct Answer: A) Only two
đź§ Explanation:
•1) ✅ True – STR analysis uses nuclear DNA and is highly specific to individuals.
•2) ❌ False – mtDNA is inherited only from the mother, not both parents.
•3) ❌ False – Y-STR traces paternal lineage, not maternal.
•4) ✅ True – SNP analysis is used for highly degraded DNA samples.
MCQ 2 – Type 2: Two Statements Based
Consider the following statements:
1. DNA degrades more quickly in bones than in soft tissues like muscles.
2. DNA samples should be preserved ideally at -20°C or stored in 95% ethanol if refrigeration isn’t available.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
A) Only 1 is correct
B) Only 2 is correct
C) Both are correct
D) Neither is correct
🌀 Didn’t get it? Click here (▸) for the Correct Answer & Explanation
âś… Correct Answer: B) Only 2 is correct
đź§ Explanation:
•1) ❌ False – Bones and teeth preserve DNA longer than soft tissues.
•2) ✅ True – Freezing at -20°C or using ethanol are standard preservation techniques.
MCQ 3 – Type 3: Which of the statements is/are correct?
Which of the following statements about mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis are correct?
1. It is used when nuclear DNA is unavailable or degraded.
2. It is inherited only through the maternal line.
3. It is less reliable than STR analysis due to lack of individual uniqueness.
4. It can be used to identify paternal relatives with high accuracy.
Select the correct code:
A) 1 and 2 only
B) 1, 2, and 3 only
C) 2 and 4 only
D) All of the above
🌀 Didn’t get it? Click here (▸) for the Correct Answer & Explanation
âś… Correct Answer: B) 1, 2, and 3 only
đź§ Explanation:
•1) ✅ Correct – mtDNA is used when nuclear DNA is too degraded.
•2) ✅ Correct – mtDNA is inherited only from the mother.
•3) ✅ Correct – Since mtDNA is not unique to individuals, it’s less precise than STR.
•4) ❌ Incorrect – mtDNA cannot be used for paternal identification.
MCQ 4 – Type 4: Direct Fact
Which DNA analysis method is most effective for identifying male victims by tracing paternal lineage?
A) STR Analysis
B) Mitochondrial DNA Analysis
C) Y-STR Analysis
D) SNP Analysis
🌀 Didn’t get it? Click here (▸) for the Correct Answer & Explanation.
âś… Correct Answer: C) Y-STR Analysis
đź§ Explanation:
•Y-STR targets short tandem repeats on the Y chromosome and is used to trace paternal male relatives. It’s most effective for identifying male victims when female reference DNA is not available.