🌑Knowledge Drop – 42: Law Ministry Defends Its Simultaneous Polls Proposal | For Prelims: InDepth MCQs| For Mains, All G.S Papers: High Quality Essays

🌿 Knowledge Drop – 042

Law Ministry Defends Its Simultaneous Polls Proposal

28 November 2025

Syllabus: GS-2 / Polity and Governance


🌱 Intro Whisper

“Democracy is not only about voting often — it is about governing wisely between votes.”

The Union Law Ministry has defended its proposal for Simultaneous Elections (One Nation, One Election), asserting that the framework does not violate the basic structure of the Constitution. The clarification comes amid ongoing parliamentary scrutiny and concerns over federalism, accountability, and democratic balance.


🏛️ Context

  • The Union Law Ministry stated that the proposed framework on simultaneous elections is constitutionally valid.
  • It argued that the proposal affects only the timing and frequency of elections, not the right to vote.
  • The issue is currently under examination by a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC).

📜 Background: The One Nation One Election Bills

  • In 2024, the Law Minister introduced:
    • The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024
    • Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill
  • These are collectively referred to as the One Nation One Election Bills.

Core Proposal

  • Synchronisation of Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assembly elections.
  • State Assemblies elected after a particular Lok Sabha may have curtailed terms to align with the Lok Sabha’s tenure.
  • Once alignment is achieved, future elections will be held simultaneously.

🧩 Role of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC)

  • The Bills were referred to the JPC to ensure:
    • They do not violate the basic structure doctrine.
    • Federal balance and democratic accountability remain intact.
  • The JPC is scheduled to meet:
    • Representatives of the 23rd Law Commission
    • Officials of the Election Commission of India
      on December 4.

⚖️ View of the Union Law Ministry

1️⃣ Five-Year Tenure Is Not Absolute

  • Articles 83(2) and 172(1) provide a five-year term for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies “unless sooner dissolved.”
  • The Ministry argues this clause was deliberately included by the Constitution’s framers to allow flexibility.

2️⃣ Basic Structure Doctrine Not Violated

  • The basic structure protects:
    • Separation of powers
    • Federalism
    • Democratic governance
  • The Ministry claims:
    • The Bills do not dilute federalism.
    • They do not disturb separation of powers.

3️⃣ Impact Only on Election Timing

  • The proposal affects:
    • Duration and frequency of elections
  • It does not affect:
    • Universal adult suffrage
    • The right to vote
  • Hence, it does not breach the Constitution’s core values.

4️⃣ Accountability Remains Intact

  • Governments remain accountable until the last day of their tenure.
  • Parliamentary democracy ensures checks through:
    • Legislature
    • Judiciary
    • Public scrutiny

🗳️ What Are Simultaneous Elections?

  • Simultaneous Elections refer to holding:
    • Lok Sabha elections
    • State Assembly elections
      at the same time.

Historical Precedent

  • India followed simultaneous elections in:
    • 1951-52
    • 1957
    • 1962
    • 1967
  • The cycle broke due to:
    • Premature dissolutions
    • Political instability

✅ Arguments in Favour of One Nation One Election

  • Reduced Expenditure: Lower costs for repeated elections.
  • Administrative Efficiency: Single election cycle simplifies logistics.
  • Reduced MCC Disruptions:
    • Frequent elections trigger prolonged Model Code of Conduct, delaying:
      • Policy decisions
      • Welfare schemes
      • Development projects
  • Clear Accountability: Voters assess Central and State performance together.
  • Cooperative Federalism: Harmonised electoral cycles reduce political friction.

❌ Arguments Against One Nation One Election

  • Logistical Challenges:
    • Massive coordination of security, EVMs, personnel.
  • Marginalisation of Local Issues:
    • National narratives may overshadow regional concerns.
  • Complex Constitutional Changes:
    • Requires multiple amendments and legal restructuring.
  • Federalism Concerns:
    • Curtailing or extending State Assembly tenures affects State autonomy.

🔮 Way Ahead

  • The Law Commission is likely to recommend:
    • Simultaneous elections for all three tiers of government
      • Lok Sabha
      • State Assemblies
      • Local bodies (Panchayats & Municipalities)
  • The proposed rollout year: 2029.
  • The stated goals include:
    • Transparency
    • Inclusivity
    • Voter confidence
    • Governance stability

🌿 Closing Note

The debate on simultaneous elections is not merely about electoral calendars. It is about balancing efficiency with federalism, and stability with democratic diversity. Whether One Nation One Election strengthens Indian democracy will ultimately depend not on intent alone, but on constitutional safeguards and political consensus.


Target IAS-26: Daily MCQs :

📌 Prelims Practice MCQs

Topic: India’s Largest Geothermal Energy Pilot (Araku Valley) SET-1

MCQ 1 TYPE 1 — How Many Statements Are Correct?
Consider the following statements regarding the proposal of Simultaneous Elections in India:
1)Articles 83(2) and 172(1) of the Constitution provide for a five-year tenure of Lok Sabha and State Assemblies unless sooner dissolved.
2)The Constitution explicitly mandates that elections to Lok Sabha and State Assemblies must always be held separately.
3)The phrase “unless sooner dissolved” allows flexibility in the duration of legislatures.
4)Simultaneous elections were never held in India after Independence.
How many of the above statements are correct?
A)Only one
B)Only two
C)Only three
D)All four
🌀 Didn’t get it? Click here (▸) for the Correct Answer & Explanation.

🟩 Correct Answer: C) Only three

🧠 Explanation:
1)✅ True – Articles 83(2) and 172(1) clearly provide a five-year tenure unless sooner dissolved.
2)❌ False – The Constitution does not mandate separate elections.
3)✅ True – The phrase allows flexibility in legislative tenure.
4)❌ False – Simultaneous elections were held in 1951–52, 1957, 1962 and 1967.

MCQ 2 TYPE 2 — Two-Statement Type
Consider the following statements:
1)The Basic Structure Doctrine restricts Parliament from amending features such as federalism and separation of powers.
2)The Union Law Ministry argues that simultaneous elections violate the Basic Structure Doctrine.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
A)Only 1
B)Only 2
C)Both 1 and 2
D)Neither 1 nor 2
🌀 Didn’t get it? Click here (▸) for the Correct Answer & Explanation.

🟩 Correct Answer: A) Only 1 is correct

🧠 Explanation:
1)✅ True – Federalism and separation of powers are part of the basic structure.
2)❌ False – The Law Ministry argues that simultaneous elections do not violate the basic structure.

MCQ 3 TYPE 3 — Code-Based Statement Selection
Consider the following statements regarding “One Nation One Election”:
1)Simultaneous elections affect the timing and frequency of elections but not the right to vote.
2)Frequent enforcement of the Model Code of Conduct can delay policy decisions and welfare schemes.
3)Simultaneous elections were conducted in India during the 1950s and 1960s.
Which of the above statements are correct?
A)1 and 2 only
B)2 and 3 only
C)1 and 3 only
D)1, 2 and 3
🌀 Didn’t get it? Click here (▸) for the Correct Answer & Explanation.

🟩 Correct Answer: D) 1, 2 and 3

🧠 Explanation:
1)✅ True – Only timing and frequency are affected, not voting rights.
2)✅ True – MCC disrupts governance during frequent elections.
3)✅ True – Simultaneous elections were held until 1967.

MCQ 4 TYPE 4 — Direct Factual Question
Which of the following bodies is examining whether the One Nation One Election Bills violate the basic structure of the Constitution?
A)Election Commission of India
B)Supreme Court of India
C)Joint Parliamentary Committee
D)Inter-State Council
🌀 Didn’t get it? Click here (▸) for the Correct Answer & Explanation.

🟩 Correct Answer: C) Uranium-233
🧠 Explanation:
1) Thorium-232 → Thorium-233 → Protactinium-233 → Uranium-233 (fissile).

MCQ 5 TYPE 5 — UPSC 2025 Linkage Reasoning Format (I, II, III)
Consider the following statements:
Statement I:
Synchronising the tenure of State Legislative Assemblies under the One Nation One Election proposal may affect State autonomy.
Statement II:
Synchronisation may require curtailment or extension of State Assembly terms, which can dilute the federal balance enshrined in the Constitution.
Which one of the following is correct?
A) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II explains Statement I
B) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II does not explain Statement I
C) Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect
D) Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct
🌀 Didn’t get it? Click here (▸) for the Correct Answer & Explanation.

🟩 Correct Answer: A)

🧠 Explanation:
✅ Statement I is correct – Critics argue that synchronising elections can impact State autonomy.
✅ Statement II is correct – Altering State Assembly tenure directly affects the federal structure.
✅ Statement II correctly explains why State autonomy may be impacted under simultaneous elections.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *